LowFruits is excellent at one specific job: spotting individual keywords where the SERP is dominated by weak sites (forums, low-DA blogs). You feed it keywords; it returns the "low fruit" ones. Seotrends approaches the same problem from the opposite end: start with the weak-authority sites that are winning lots of keywords, not the keywords themselves. You get a list of entire niches to attack, not a curated keyword list.
Different starting points, same goal
LowFruits: keyword-first. Input keywords → output the easy ones. Seotrends: domain-first. Input filter (low DR + high traffic) → output domains winning in those niches → drill into their keywords. Both find easy opportunities; the workflow path is different.
When to use LowFruits
If you have a specific list of keywords and want to know which are realistically rankable, LowFruits is purpose-built. It scans SERPs and flags weak ones (high % of forums, weak DA results).
Want to see it on real domains?
One click — 50% off your first month, full access to the entire database.
When to use Seotrends
If you don't have a keyword list yet — if you're still picking a niche — Seotrends is faster. Filter the 100K+ trending domains by DR + age + traffic value, and the resulting list is your "niches with weak competition + proven traffic" shortlist. Then drill into each domain to see their keyword strategy.
Run both for max coverage
Workflow: Seotrends to find the niche + the winning sites, LowFruits to validate specific keywords within that niche before committing to content. Belt and suspenders.
Pricing
LowFruits charges per credit (varies). Seotrends is flat: $95/mo Pro, $49 Starter, $195 Agency — and your first month is 50% off.
